Educational content on VJDementia is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

Share this video  

EAN 2023 | Implementation of personalized prevention strategies for dementia

Nicolas Villain, MD, PhD, from Sorbonne University, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France, explains how current health infrastructure can be modified to implement personalized prevention strategies for Alzheimer’s disease globally. Dr Villain suggests dividing the population into two levels of risk; the base-level of risk found in the whole population and individuals at higher risk of developing neurodegenerative disease. These individuals may be considered to be at higher risk due to lifestyle choices, genetic factors, or presence of disease biomarkers such as amyloid or tau aggregates. Public health policies and advice for maintaining brain health should be provided at population level, but for at-risk individuals, health services could provide specific lifestyle recommendations alongside personalized treatment strategies, such as anti-amyloid antibodies or anti-tau vaccines currently undergoing clinical trials. Recorded at the 9th Congress of the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) 2023 held in Budapest, Hungary.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript (edited for clarity)

That’s a key question. How do we translate these results from a randomized controlled clinical trial into clinical practice? So, I think we have to separate things. There are things that can be done on a population-based level, which is, of course, everything we would like. Meaning that all of the population can be at risk for dementia and we would like all the population to benefit from this kind of program but we also know that it’s unrealistic to implement such detail and training in the whole population...

That’s a key question. How do we translate these results from a randomized controlled clinical trial into clinical practice? So, I think we have to separate things. There are things that can be done on a population-based level, which is, of course, everything we would like. Meaning that all of the population can be at risk for dementia and we would like all the population to benefit from this kind of program but we also know that it’s unrealistic to implement such detail and training in the whole population. So, we need to have several levels of prevention, with a first level, which would be the population-based level, where that can be implemented through a general practitioner, through politics and through public health policy across the world. Which could be very basic advice or monitoring of certain factors in the general population and then in more at-risk individuals that could be identified in brain health services, meaning memory clinics. So, people will come here, they have concerns regarding their memory, we identify their risk, like if they have for example markers of amyloidopathy or tauopathy or neurodegeneration or lifestyle factors that we can identify and then propose them targeted approaches to reduce their risk of dementia. So, it could be a two-level approach, general population and then brain health services for individuals with a specific concern who may be more at risk with specific risk and specific intervention. And when I mean also specific intervention, I mean, beyond the lifestyle intervention I mentioned, with currently ongoing randomized controlled clinical trials using drugs like anti-amyloid antibodies in asymptomatic individuals or anti-tau vaccine or everything that could be tested in these at-risk populations.

Read more...